MIX : The Pie chart and bar chart shows some data which concerned on arrest number
The pie charts illustrate the number of arrested people between 1989 and 1994 and the figure elucidates the percentage of numerous reasons of most recent jailing. At first glance, it is evident that a majority of females are not jailed and overall, it is also able to be seen that public drinking became the most enormous number which caused people to get arrested.
To begin with, the total number of males who were jailed is lower than the men who is not in charge of law. Nevertheless, females are following the same pattern as men in which the total number of women who are not arrested are higher rather than females which do not have a tribulation to law.
In accordance with the second graph, public drinking and drink driving have become the most noticeable reasons in comparing to other aspects since the percentage of it is extremely higher than others. Furthermore, Breach of order, assault, theft and other reason aspects have the same percentage of reasons which are approximately at well beneath two-tenths. Last but not least, no reason has become the lowest aspect which is compared to other reasons, roughly at just above five in ten (females) and just under 5% (males).
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West park Secondary School since its construction in 1950. 73
- Bar chart : the percentage of boys, girls and all for chatting on the internet and playing on games console. 78
- The line graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists.Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages? 73
- Some of people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, nevertheless, second, so, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4727464896 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.309963338 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139241905254 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681833146463 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647363346209 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100181354749 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591297930288 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.