The recent years have witnessed a steadily growing role of the Internet in daily life. Actions like shopping, booking holidays, checking the bank account often perceived as a waste of time, can these days easily carried out thanks the Internet. Concerns about safety have been risen and whether the benefits of relying on this technology outweigh the negative sides is still up for debate. I firmly believe that the Internet is instrumental in supporting us in numerous fields and that the less brighter aspects of it can not obscure the positive influence on our life.
Probably the most advanced breakthrough of the past century, the possibilities granted by the Internet are migrating regularly into daily life. This technology allow us to spare time and energy that we can invest in learning or exercising. Contrary to what some people are trying to tout, using the Internet is basically safe. Of course, cyber crime does exist but taking simple precautions like installing antivirus programs and updating the operating system, is enough to avert serious damage. Once the user has set up those easy steps there is no need to worry and accessing the Internet is worth a try. Beyond the endless content of information, the Internet can also support us in handling tedious tasks like paying bills or searching for items in overcrowded malls. With a couple of clicks and often with prices below the average, goods can be quickly ordered and shipped to our address without living home. Moreover, checking the bank account is far more comfortable from a computer than heading for the bank. In most cases one has to wait for a long time, just to know how much money on the account is left. Even in fields like booking holiday and hotel, the Internet has showed its potential. These days users are able to explore exotic places, reserve a car, pick up a hotel, and book the cheapest flights in a matter of minutes. Hard to believe, but not such a long time ago, all those actions would have requested days, maybe weeks, to be successfully completed.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the Internet should be a constant part of our daily life and concerns about safety are just unnecessary alarming and unjustified. Dangers are everywhere, when we cross the street, when we drive, even when we stay home. Taking basic safety precautions is all users need to surf the Internet and profit from the benefits of this extraordinary tool.
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is this a negative or positive development 56
- Nowadays more and more children acquire unhealthy eating habits Why is it happening What can be done to solve this issue 89
- Some people say that all mobile cell phone conversations should be banned in public and crowded places Others disagree Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
- The increase in people s life expectancy means that they have to work older to pay for their retirement One alternative is that people start to work at a younger age Is this alternative a positive or negative development 47
- Scientists tell us that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that millions of people continue doing unhealthy activities What are the causes and what are the solutions for this 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 491, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less bright'?
Suggestion: less bright
...ting us in numerous fields and that the less brighter aspects of it can not obscure the posit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, still, as to, in conclusion, of course, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 5.60731707317 446% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 965.302439024 210% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 413.0 196.424390244 210% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90072639225 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 3.73543355544 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55552690732 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 106.607317073 223% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 283.868780488 225% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 8.94146341463 212% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1959227395 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.526315789 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7368421053 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 3.70975609756 377% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103226810462 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319501359439 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274057600975 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660358701408 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254140647396 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 40.7170731707 273% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.