Noise pollution in cities and rural areas
The pie graphs show how many people living in urban and rural areas, were affected by four different kinds of noise pollution during daytime and nighttime in 2007.
Overall, it is noticeable from the charts that the total number of people who were influenced by distinct types of noise in city was higher than that in rural area. At the same time, the figure affected by traffic was by far highest in both two research areas during the given period.
There were 64 million people who were influenced by noise from traffic in day in urban area while the figure is relatively lower in rural area, at 34 million. At night, traffic noise affected 48 million people in cities, doubled the number for rural areas. In addition, the number of people affected by train noise in urban area was slightly higher in comparison with the rural area, with 10 and 8 million, respectively, during daytime and 8 and 6 million people, respectively during nighttime.
Meanwhile, noise pollution caused by aircraft had influences on a quantity of 4 million people in cities and half the number in rural area in day. The figure at night in both rural and urban area stood at 1 million. In contrast, those living in rural area were not affected by industry noise, compared with urban area. One million people affected by noise from industry during daytime in the city, four times the number of people at night.
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Rate of unemployment in the UK 61
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 440, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ur times the number of people at night.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7520661157 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35916759552 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462809917355 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8602273735 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38519657227 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19316240463 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103376030934 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264262513835 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689734615172 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.