The given line graph illustrates the rate of travellers who visited Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003.
As can be seen, In this initial period(1995), The number of visitors in Dubai was 48 thousand then it touched the rock bottom, amounting to 45 thousand in the year 1996. The quantity of travellers had declined to 160 thousand by 1999, after reaching the gradual increase of 170 thousand in 1997. In spite of an increase of 90 thousand reaching 350 in 2000, the rate of tourist in Dubai had dropped to 310 thousand by 2002. In the final year (2003) the total of holidaymakers reached the zenith of 400 thousand.
On the other hand, in the case of Malaysia reached the nadir accounting for 100 thousand in 1995. Then it had a dramatical increase from 1996 to 2001, after the rate of tourist reached the pinnacle, amounting to 320 thousand in 2001. The quantity of trippers in Malaysia had plummeted to 240 thousand in 2003 after touching 280 thousand in 2002.
Over all it is cristal clear from the diagram the rate of tourist visited in Dubai is higher than Malaysia. In the initial stage Malaysia had more visitor compare with Dubai.
- The map shows the development of Meadowside village and Fonton over three different time periods (1962,1985 and present) Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people claim that there are more disadvantages of the car than its advantages. Do you agree or disagree? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a car. 73
- The bar chart below shows the no of research students studying different subject in 2005 87
- The number of tourists visiting Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003 is presented below.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown in the diagrams below.Write at least 150 words. 67
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67326732673 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48946412393 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.575176387 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143518887234 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754344198974 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605859640574 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125617176437 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592644157079 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.