Contained in the bar chart provided is data pertaining to the proportion of males and females doing regular exercises by age ranges in Australia in 2010. Overall, the proportion of both genders doing exercises decreased when people get older.
Regarding the age range from 15 to 44 years old, one sees that there was a pattern of downward in males, whereas the percentage of females was upward. It is clear that, at the age of 15-24, there were 52.8% of males participating in physical activity, which was 5.1% higher than the figure of females. However, the proportion of males at the age range of 25-34 and 35-44 declined remarkably to 42.2% and 39.5%, respectively. Contrasting event took place with females, as it experienced a gradual rise to 48.9% at 25-34 years old and then to 52.5% at 35-44 years old.
Turing to the remaining age range, the event was apparently different from the former age range, as the percentage of males started to recover while the figure of females witnessed a downswing. From 45 years old and over, the percentage of males increased modestly from 43.1% to 46.7% when they reached 65 years old. Nevertheless, after a slight increase to the top at 53.3% at the age of 45-54, the figure represented a moderate decline to 47.1% when they are 65 years old and over.
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 47
- Bar chart: amount spent on consumer goods 67
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the US and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system. 84
- Share of total employment, Camba District, 1996-1999 95
- The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78666666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63991769419 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542222222222 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1613516791 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.07883304927 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388435059666 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423205780708 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666235450814 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481817752344 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.