the percentage of different types of waste recycled
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of four different types of waste which were recycled over a decade from 1992 to 2002.
Overall, there were considerable upward trends in the total of recycled waste over the period given. Another interesting point is that glass always made up the majority of the number of waste reprocessed.
Looking at details, in 1992 the percentage of glass which was recycled was 15% compared to nearly 13% for Paper. Then this figure for glass doubled continuously to over 30% and 50% in 1997 and 2002 respectively. Similarly, experienced a dramatic soar by nearly 5% in 1997, finally reached the peak at 40% which was as twice as higher compared to its figure in 1997.
On the other hand, the amount of cans and plastic waste reused both started with just 10% in 1992 and improving slowly in the next following years. Meanwhile, this figure for plastic has levelled off at just 12% since 1997, the proportion of cans which was recycled rose gradually to exactly 20% in 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows changes in the percentage households with c in one European country between 1971 and 2001 76
- The graph below shows UK air pollutants in millionsof tonnes, from three different sources, between1990 and 2005. 73
- the percentage of different types of waste recycled 86
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, similarly, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81034482759 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54763703957 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0050945445 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23245778623 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968966156668 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957745199484 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152194667429 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998415663699 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.