Consumption of Spreads
The graph illustrates the information about the use of three spreads include margarine, low-fat and reduced spreads and butter over a 26-year period between 1981 and 2007. Units are measured in grams.
Overall, what stand out from the graph is that there was considerable the upward trend in eating Low-fat and reduced spreads, whereas the figure for butter had shown a dramatic decline. On the other hand, the consumption of margarine stayed unchanged over the period. Another interesting point is that Low-fat and reduced spreads appeared much later than others products but it rapidly ranked the first place in the graph in 2007.
Looking at the details, Butter is the most popular spread at the beginning in over 140 grams and continued to grow steadily in next five years, reached the peak about 160 grams in 1986. However, for the rest of period the figure for butter started going down sharply, dropping from 160 grams to just nearly 65 grams in 2007. By contrast, Low-fat and reduced spreads was a new production which has just emerged lately in 1996 with 10 grams but the use of it had an enormous rise reached the peak 90 grams in 2001 then ended the period with 70 grams.
Meanwhile, the consumption of Margarine has remained fairly constant over the period, fluctuating between 90 and 40 grams, a slight decrease.
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons and how can people learn more about natural world? 89
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows changes in the percentage households with c in one European country between 1971 and 2001 76
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88938053097 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39669888747 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575221238938 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8669053296 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.777777778 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190804656509 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758373439525 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625186128109 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120418753875 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342767163337 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.