Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking?
Fast food vs. Sitdown restaurant?
The given four circular charts reveal the information about the budget of food spent on reataurant meals and home cooking, and second liner chart shows the information about the fast foid and sitdown restaurant meals during the year 1970-2000. The data is calibrated in both percentum and number which is clearly and coherently represented.
It is crystal clear from the charts, in the year 1970 the budget of food spent on home cooking was highest. In addition to this, during the year 2000 both restaurant meals either or home cooking had equal. Moreover, in the year 1970,1980 and 2000 the budget spent on restaurant meals was 10%, 15% and 35% respectively.
As far as trend was concerned that during the year 1970 to 1980 the sitdown restaurant meals was increased. Futhermore, the fast food meals during the year 1990 to 2000 was increased upto 80 number of meals. Moving further, in the year 1980 to 1990 the sit down meals was 30 to 45 number of meals.
Overall, it is evident that the budget of food spent on home cooking is decreased year by year. The fast food meals has increased year by year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-04 | Manpreetgill | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-04 | Manpreetgill | 61 | view |
- The table below gives information about Favorite pastime in different cauntries in percentage. (/means data not avilable) 11
- The daigrams show the stages and equipment used in the process of cement making and how cement is used to produce the cancrete for building purposes? 78
- The three pie charts below show the chnges in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001. 73
- The table below gives information about favorite pastime in different countries in percentage 59
- The Diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eals was 10%, 15% and 35% respectively. As far as trend was concerned that during ...
^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...oving further, in the year 1980 to 1990 the sit down meals was 30 to 45 number of meals...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, second, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71134020619 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43914127086 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453608247423 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7761446749 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380908041443 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179567171281 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945986162938 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268960296339 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666661202863 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.