The percentage of people by age group in one country in 2015. Who used mobile/cell phone for four situations.
The bar chart gives information about how frequently people of a nation in different age groups use their phones in 2015. In general, teenagers and the under 30s usually use their phone in all four situations meanwhile the phones of the eldest are least used.
In public transport, the age group from 18 to 29 was seen to use the phones most in 90% while in a street and a restaurant, they just stood at the second position at 80% and over 71% respectively. People from 30 to 49 used their cell phones less than the first group when they were in public transportation, at approximately 80%. There were around 85% of the 30s to 49s using their mobile phones in the street, compared to 79% of those in restaurants.
The percentage of people in the group from 50 to 64 just decreased 10% basics steadily from 50% in the order of public transportation, street and restaurant. The figures for the eldest was the lowest among four sectors: 20% in public transportation, under 10% in the street and 10% for both restaurant and family dinner. Family dinner was the time that people from all different age groups used leastly.
- The diagrams below show changes of a cinema from 1980 until now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 73
- The chart show the different how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015 78
- The percentage of people by age group in one country in 2015 Who used mobile cell phone for four situations 56
- There is a shortage of housing in many countries and this can lead to severe social consequences Only governments can solve this problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73333333333 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86691893757 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471794871795 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2838491135 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.555555556 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328745089689 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167710426368 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107968178624 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260847919871 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105487605896 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.