The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban, rural and town between 1995 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two bar charts compare the percentage of people born in three types of areas (cities, towns, and rural areas) that are either inside or outside Australian territory in 1995 and 2010.
Looking from an overall perspective, there have been some significant changes in terms of the locations where people are born. In 1995 most people are born in cities that are outside and inside Australia and this still remained the same in 2010. Meanwhile, the number of people born in the two remained areas both inside and outside Australia decreased significantly.
Beginning with the 1995 bar chart, it can be easily observed that cities inside and outside Australia had the highest population, at 50% and 60% respectively. The proportion of people born in towns that belonged to Australia was 20%, while the figure for towns outside Australia was only 10%. About 30% of citizens are born in Australia's rural areas and 40% of babies are born in rural areas outside Australia.
Turning to the second bar chart, we can see that the gaps between the number of people born in cities and remained areas are very large. Inside Australia, more than 60% of people were born in cities, which was around 47% higher than those who were born in towns and rural areas. Moreover, up to 80% of people were born in big cities outside Australia, while the rates of newborns in towns and rural areas outside Australia were less than 10%.
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 67
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83950617284 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37986780445 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465020576132 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.0335446371 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.6 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419089098385 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194233505103 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085398548165 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268433993625 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074133835045 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.