The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban, rural and town between 1995 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant
The bar charts illustrate the rate of people who were born in Australia and outside Australia living in cities, towns, and rural areas from 1995 to 2020.
Overall, the percentage of people who were born in cities increased in 2 groups between 1995 and 2010. Moreover, people who were born in Australia and outside Australia living in the cities were the biggest.
The proportion of people who were born in Australia living in cities increased from around 50 % in 1995 to about 65 % in 2010. Meanwhile, the rate of people in this group living in towns accounted for about 20% in 1995 but decreased slightly to 18 % in 2010. In the same downtrend, the data of people born in Australia living in rural areas dropped significantly from around 35% to 18%.
With people who were born outside Australia, the percentage of people living in cities rose from 60 % to 80% over the period of 15 years. The rate of people born outside Australia living in towns fell slightly from 15 % in 1995 to 10 % in 2010. The percentage of people born outside Australia living in rural areas dropped sharply from around 40% to about 5 % in 2 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | reverjae | 78 | view |
- It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media do you agree that it is the main reason for a growth in the rate of juvenile crime What solutions can be offer to deal with this situation 84
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person 11
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible 84
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65656565657 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46640243827 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.358585858586 0.547539520022 65% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 15.9242031799 43.030603864 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517162185688 0.215688989381 240% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.302780443634 0.103423049105 293% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095854490813 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.409069061799 0.15604864568 262% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698477051301 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.56 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.