The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban, rural and town between 1995 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant
The bar charts show information on the proportion of native citizens and migrators to Australia in urban, rural and town from 1995 to 2010.
Overall, in a period of 15 years, the total amount of people living in town and rural areas from two groups of citizens decreased while there was a surge in Australia’s city dwellers, which ranked first in number of citizens among 3 areas.
Considering native people in Australia, in 1995, the percentage of people living in cities was the highest with nearly 50% before it surpassed 60% in 2010. Despite a rise in city dwellers, the proportion of people living in rural areas dropped from over 30% (1995) to under 20% (2010). The percentage of Australia’s town citizens also decreased slightly during 15 years.
In terms of migrators to Australia, the ratio of people living in cities soared from 60% to 80% in 15 years. However, in the same amount of time, the percentage of rural citizens fell nearly tenfold from 40% to approximately 10%. Moreover, there were slightly less people residing in town in 2010 compared to in 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | reverjae | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The widespread use of Internet has brought many problems What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of Internet What solutions can you suggest 67
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 61
- The chart below compares the number of people per household by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001 67
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: first
...Australia’s city dwellers, which ranked first in number of citizens among 3 areas. Considering...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...tely 10%. Moreover, there were slightly less people residing in town in 2010 compare...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, moreover, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85326086957 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64199199315 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494565217391 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5911405205 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256157078987 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132859541789 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523174552421 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179945129592 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482847970293 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.