In today’s world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters, and writers. What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
Artists such as musicians, painters and writers still receive much appreciation, despite the prevalence of science and technology in modern times. The reason is that the arts can teach us about specific aspects of life, which technology or science cannot explain.
Firstly, arts have the ability to preserve people’s emotions over time, which science and technology cannot. Through some art forms such as music and films, individuals could express their feelings and wishes from the past to the present. For example, many patriotic songs were written to ignite the spirits of Vietnamese people during invasions. Until today, listening to the old song can bring back a sense of pride for the Vietnamese because it reminds them of the hardships before establishing peace.
Secondly, arts can reflect the overlooked aspects of life, which science is unable to. Artists tend to utilize many art forms such as songs, movies or pictures to imply the hidden beauty of life to viewers. This means that people could be able to appreciate the world more by recognizing the values of art pieces. For instance, looking at a painting of the night sky can bring people a sense of appreciation to the scenery that they have never paid attention to. Technological machines, however, can only replicate the painting in terms of details not implications.
In conclusion, although advanced science and technology play an important part in modern life, they are unable to teach people to appreciate the forgotten beauty of life and express emotions throughout a long period like the arts.
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think the government funding should be used for supporting art and cultures others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people say that drug companies have a responsibility to spend money on researching medicines that will help people in poorer countries Others say the main responsibility of drug companies is to make money Discuss both these views and give your own op 73
- The bar chart on the next page shows the results of a survey of the reading habits of male and female first year university students at a university in the UK The pie chart show the amount of time male and female students spend on various activities 92
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in terms of details not implications. In conclusion, although advanced science...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20392156863 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67181164572 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596078431373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3440351212 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.583333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363038711808 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127411991911 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990146718383 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23086171511 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12728572851 0.056905535591 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.