percentage of tourist to Scotland who visited Edinburgh attraction
The given graph illustrates the proportion of visitors in four distinct attractions in Scotland in the period of three decades.
The castle attracted tourists most of the time. The festival had a negligible change in visitors and the others fluctuated considerably.
In 1980, a fifth of tourists to Scotland, which was two times higher than people coming to the zoo, visited the aquarium in Edinburgh. The following two years, the percentage of tourists attracted by the zoo and the rate of visitors in the aquarium hit the peak. They both hit the trough in 1990 and continued to hit the peak and the trough at the same time from 1995 to 2005. In 2010, the proportion of tourists to Edinburgh’s zoo reached the highest point which was 20%. On the contrary, the rate of visitors who came to the aquarium accounted for under 10%, it reached the lowest point.
The festival was the most attractive place in Edinburgh. 30% of tourists wanted to visit it when they came to Edinburgh. The rate of visitors taking part in the festival oscillated around a fourth until 2010. The proportion of Edinburgh’s castle visitors was the second highest in 1980. Then it rose sharply to approximately 45% in 1995 and became the highest till the latest time mentioned in the line graph.
- the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them happy the most Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003
- The pie charts show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003
- Studies have shown that many criminals have a low level of education For this reason some people believe that the best way to reduce crime is to educate people in prison so that they can get a job when they leave Do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...le attracted tourists most of the time. The festival had a negligible change in vis...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85844748858 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70949069727 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493150684932 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0810323653 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8461538462 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8461538462 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53846153846 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321154627242 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112908514141 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935293461127 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172847990051 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582846368562 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.