The bar chart compares the proportion of British men, women and children who fulfilled the daily suggested intake of fruits and vegetables from 2002 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that women were the most likely to have eaten the recommended amount of fruits and vegetables in a day. By contrast, children were the least likely demographic to have done so.
In 2002, a quarter of women consumed their suggested intake of fruits and vegetables every day, compared to 22% for men and only 11% for children. Growth was seen in all three demographics 4 years later. The percentage of men successfully consuming the daily recommended amount rose by 4 percentage points, while a more dramatic growth of 7 percentage points was experienced by the figures for women and kids.
2010 observed a regression in the figures for all three demographics. The percentage for both men and children dropped slightly, recording 24% and 16% respectively. Meanwhile, the figures for women witnessed a steep fall of 6 percentage points, ending the period at 26%.
- The charts give data on the proportion of time and the places people of different age groups in the country of Fantasia spend and go for information on a weekly basis. 73
- The means of transportation has changed and improved over many centuries Long ago during the times of the kings and knights animals such as horses buffaloes and camels were used by man for transportation purposes These animals no doubt did save man from t 90
- The first chart below shows the number of British visitors to the US and American visitors to the UK from 2011 to 2015 The second chart shows the amount spent by those visitors in that period 84
- The table below shows the results of a 20 year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07514450867 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88808016683 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8106677964 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18553252348 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755148655231 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659055793431 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118893514202 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051574982625 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.