Percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world
The pie charts illustrates the amount of water used for various objectives in six major regions around the world. The given pie charts have been divided into three portions depicting the usage of water by the industrial, domestic and agricultural sectors.
It is clearly evident that the Asians use more water for cultivation which is over 80 percent. Especially the central Asian community utilises as low as only 5 percent of the water for Industrial usage. Similar to Asian region, the African use major amount of water for agricultural purposes.
Secondly, we could see a different trend the way water been utilised among the North american & Europeans. A major portion of the water have been consumed towards Industrial use. Also when compared between North & south Americans, we could seethe south Americans are majorly into farming as 71% of water getting used towards agriculture use.
Finally, to sum up the given sets of pie charts shows all the regions use water as their major source for irrigation with some exceptions to like those in North Americas U Europe where a major percent of water is diverted towards industrial use.
- One of the major problems facing the world today is the growing number of refugees. The developed nations in the world should tackle this problem by taking more refugees.To what extent do you agree with this opinion? 73
- Average annual expenditures on cell phones and residential phone services 77
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 61
- Percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 22
Transition Words or Phrases used:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 33.7804878049 9% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 95.0 965.302439024 10% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 19.0 196.424390244 10% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 2.08779762993 3.73543355544 56% => The fourth root words length is low.
Word Length SD: 2.47088307249 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 17.0 106.607317073 16% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.894736842105 0.547539520022 163% => OK
syllable_count: 28.8 283.868780488 10% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.0 5.23603664747 0% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291672235317 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.291672235317 0.103423049105 282% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291672235317 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 4.0 40.7170731707 10% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.