The picture showa the changes of
The picture depicts the variations of a park from 1980 to still now.
Ovetall,it is plainly viewed that the park had flowers area which is changed to play ground.however, pond and beach have the same locality.
It is explicitly observed that in 1989 the park had 2 gates which elevate now 2 to 4.the park had trees on the northeast and now it has changed to picnic chairs,desks,and barbeque trees.the trees area were in rectanwin 1980 but now it is in the form of circle.the most striking point is that the pond and beach have the same place.there is no change in this locality.
Turning to the next,flowers which were the southwest are now converted into another place which is bush and now it is little small than as it used to be in 1980.next,the flowers which were at the east-south side but there is a play ground.there are two buses available .but it used to be only one.
- Nowadays buy more and more things things which are unnecessary why it so happening 56
- Some people believe that young people should have university education this will bring benifiy to society others believe that it will lead to graduate unemployment discus both view and give opinion 67
- The world of work is changing rapidly employees would not be able to depand on the same job or working condition for a long time in near furture 89
- Some people believe that young people should have university education this will 67
- Some people think that children centres provide the best services for children play school age other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better cares for their kids 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... a park from 1980 to still now. Ovetall,it is plainly viewed that the park had flo...
^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , desks
... and now it has changed to picnic chairs,desks,and barbeque trees.the trees area were ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...nic chairs,desks,and barbeque trees.the trees area were in rectanwin 1980 but now it ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , flowers
...e in this locality. Turning to the next,flowers which were the southwest are now conver...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...small than as it used to be in 1980.next,the flowers which were at the east-south si...
^^^^
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lay ground.there are two buses available .but it used to be only one.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54088050314 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79233950702 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.564574603 43.030603864 278% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 180.5 112.824112599 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.75 22.9334400587 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094520569236 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690977505755 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427084557482 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690977505755 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427084557482 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.