A glance at the table provided reveals the information of the total value of fish that was imported to the US in 1988, 1992 and 2000, while the three put charts illustrate the amount of fish that was brought into the US.
Overall, within these years, the value of imports rose by almost double. At the beginning of the period, Canada accounted for the predominant import sources, whereas at the end of the researching years, sources imported by other countries had surpassed the countries listed.
Regarding the table, the total revenue in 1988 was at approximately 6.5 billion, increasing to around 8.the billion in 1992, and amounting to nearly 11 billion in 2000.
In terms of the source of fish importation, Canada occupied as the major supplier at 60% in 1988, far more than China and other countries which solely accounted for less than 15% and 30% respectively. By 1992, other countries had replaced Canada as the main sources at over 45% and over 40% by the year 2000. Until 2000, China witnessed a nearly threefold increase to 30%.
- The Chart below show the males and females arrested over 5 years and the reasons for the most recent arrests 84
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- the line graph shows visits to and from the uk from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by uk residents in 1999. summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 73
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 67
- The pie chart and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87709497207 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56835031345 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.681167438 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280289867715 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121063859179 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110696293923 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173187448938 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125631953652 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.