The pie chart below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three
countries.
The charts compare the different methods used in treating hazardous waste produced
across three different nations.
It is clear that the Republic of Korea recycled most of its dreadful waste products. While, uk
has dumped the dangerous waste underground rather than reusing them.
Looking at the charts, it is evident that the Republic of Korea stood on top at recycling the
waste by 69%. This is followed by 55% in Sweden. By contrast, uk has deposited the
dangerous waste material underground and this accounts to slightly more than three
quarters of the total waste treated(82%).
On the other hand, incineration is widely used method in Sweden at 20% in contrast, it is by
far the least used in Uk (2%). The chemical treatment and dumping at sea are the methods
which are only used in the uk to treat the dangerous waste produced. These two methods
figured the same at 8%.
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- The pie chart below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in threecountries. 61
- In the past, when students did a university degree, they tended to study in their own country. Nowadays, they have more opportunity to study abroad. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development? You should use your own ideas, knowledge an 56
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The pie chart below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in threecountries. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Across
... in treating hazardous waste produced across three different nations. It is clear ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed most of its dreadful waste products. While, uk has dumped the dangerous waste un...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Has
...ts dreadful waste products. While, uk has dumped the dangerous waste underground ...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Waste
...f Korea stood on top at recycling the waste by 69%. This is followed by 55% in Swed...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Quarters
... accounts to slightly more than three quarters of the total waste treated82%. On the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Far
...n Sweden at 20% in contrast, it is by far the least used in Uk 2%. The chemical t...
^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...nt and dumping at sea are the methods which are only used in the uk to treat the da...
^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nt and dumping at sea are the methods which are only used in the uk to treat the da...
^^^^^
Line 23, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Figured
...ous waste produced. These two methods figured the same at 8%.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98013245033 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5468032404 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.661238444 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5555555556 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 3.83414634146 313% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128314219364 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549849173329 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044639699796 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0522271710167 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486306651084 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.