The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region

One of the current environmental problems of the planet is worldwide land degradation. All the processes that change the condition of the soil, worsen its functions and lead to a loss of fertility, are the causes of this degradation. There are 3 main types of degradation at the moment. First and main factor, that occur around the world is over-grazing. This reason is 35% of alternations of soil. Second big cause is a deforestation. This kind of human activity violates the Earth ecosystem since ancient times. If all this continues, then soon there will be no place on earth suitable for life. Moreover, forest fires lead to the depletion and destruction of the earth.
Besides a significant contribution to the degradation of soil is made by traditional management of agricultural work. It is caused by the use of large heavy equipment, increasing of the size cultivated fields the number of pesticides. If we observe this degradation problem by region, for example in North America, Europe and Oceania, we can notice that more worse picture observed in Europe in all 3 main features of soil changing. However, dramatically over-grazing is noticed in Oceania, about 11,3%, twice bigger than in Europe and approximately in ten bigger that in North America.
In conclusion, it need to mark that degradation of soil happen worldwide, so we must to save our Earth from exceedingly human activities.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 98, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put before the verb 'back'.
Suggestion: often back
...Andreev said: 'to go forward, look back often, otherwise you will forget where you ca...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in general, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80413585772 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625531914894 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.6535370417 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9166666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00992432741448 0.215688989381 5% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00370940865955 0.103423049105 4% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00829587183603 0.0843802449381 10% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00415692837473 0.15604864568 3% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00720001114845 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.