The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990
The circular diagram reveals the cause behind land degradation,and the tabular chart illustrates how these causes affected three regions of the world during the period of 1990. The data is calculated in percentage.
Itcan be clearly evident that, 30% of worldwide land deforestation was due to the deforestation.Moving further 28% of land was deforestation by overcultivation and 35% of land was due to overgrazing.Moreover 7% land was degraded by otge reasons.
Moving further to tabular chart ,it can be clearly evident that Land was degraded by deforestation was 0.2% in North America where as 9.8% in Europe and 1.7% in Oceania.Moreover 3.3% land of North America and 7.7% land of europe degraded due to overcultivation.While in Oceania 11.3% land is decorated by overgrazing where as in Oceania there was no effect of overcultivation on the land production. 1.5% and 5.5%Land of North America Europe respectively affected by overgrazing.
From overall analysis it can be clearly seen that overgrazing is the main reason of land degradation and it is also the main reason of land degradation in ocenia
- As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. 95
- Parents are the best teachers, Usespecific reasons and examples tosupport your answer. You shouldgive reasons for your answer usingyour own ideas and experience. 11
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990 56
- Many People suffer from isomnia . What do you think, is it caused by increasing pace of life or the individuals life style is at fault? 61
- The bar chart below shows the result of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers : those age from 18 - 30 and those aged 45 - 60, and shows factor affecting their work performance. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...eveals the cause behind land degradation,and the tabular chart illustrates how these...
^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of worldwide land deforestation was due to the deforestation.Moving further 28% ...
^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moving
...restation was due to the deforestation.Moving further 28% of land was deforestation b...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
... and 35% of land was due to overgrazing.Moreover 7% land was degraded by otge reasons....
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... and 35% of land was due to overgrazing.Moreover 7% land was degraded by otge reasons....
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of land was due to overgrazing.Moreover 7% land was degraded by otge reasons. ...
^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sons. Moving further to tabular chart ,it can be clearly evident that Land was ...
^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e clearly evident that Land was degraded by deforestation was 0.2% in North Amer...
^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...early evident that Land was degraded by deforestation was 0.2% in North America ...
^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...deforestation was 0.2% in North America where as 9.8% in Europe and 1.7% in Oceania.More...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...e as 9.8% in Europe and 1.7% in Oceania.Moreover 3.3% land of North America and 7.7% lan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...e as 9.8% in Europe and 1.7% in Oceania.Moreover 3.3% land of North America and 7.7% lan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...America and 7.7% land of europe degraded due to overcultivation.While in Oceania ...
^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...europe degraded due to overcultivation.While in Oceania 11.3% land is decorated by o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... 11.3% land is decorated by overgrazing where as in Oceania there was no effect of overc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rth America Europe respectively affected by overgrazing. From overall analysis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29943502825 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.68651752198 2.65546596893 139% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502824858757 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 118.770086021 43.030603864 276% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 156.333333333 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 1.69756097561 943% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197505061451 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116285458309 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109145083224 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149484683541 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996278025893 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.