The pie chart gives information about the leading causes of the decrease in agricultural land productivity, while the table illustrates the effects of these reasons on North America, Europe, and Oceania throughout the 1990s.
Overall, the main causes of worldwide land degradation are over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation, and they affect different regions with different proportions. However, the most affected one was Europe and the least was North America.
From the pie chart, over-grazing is responsible for 35% of agricultural land degradation, and deforestation for about 30%, and over-cultivation for 28%, while 7% represents other causes of the decrease in agricultural land productivity.
Speaking of the effect of these causes on different regions, in North America 0.2 of land degraded because of deforestation and 1.7% in Oceanian, while in Europe deforestation affected 9.8 of land. Over-cultivation affected only two regions North America by 3.3% and Europe by 7.7%. In terms of over-grazing, Oceanian was the most affected by 11.3% of its land, while 5.5% of European land degraded because of it, and only 1.8% of land in North America.
- The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 84
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information. State which you consider to be the most effective.-comics-books-radio-television-film-theatre 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 77
- The chart below show the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The Table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...degradation, and deforestation for about 30%, and over-cultivation for 28%, while...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, speaking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60112359551 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4137015338 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511235955056 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2710825318 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.428571429 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197637339401 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102936087234 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572585594594 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137950902802 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479844526815 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.