The pie chart reveals information about the various factors that had negative impacts on the productivity of agricultural land, whereas the table illustrates the proportion of land degradation in three different regions of the world during the 1990s.
Overall, Over-grazing played a vital role in land degradation, followed by deforestation and over-cultivation, while Europe had almost one-fourth degraded land. Surprisingly, Oceania was not affected by over-cultivation.
To begin with, 35% of worldwide land had an impact of over-grazing, which leads to degradation, while deforestation and over-cultivation affect almost the same percentage of land, which was 30% and 28%, respectively. Besides, minor reasons were classified as "other" and accounted for 7%
Moving to the table data, 23% of Europe's land was degraded by various factors, followed by Oceania, a large group of islands in the South Pacific including Australia and New Zealand, with 13% and North America with 5%. The percentage of deforestation and over-cultivation was highest in Europe with 9.8% and 7.7%, respectively, compared to North America (0.2% and 3.3%, respectively) and Oceania with 1.7% and 0%. Furthermore, almost one-tenth of Oceania"s land had an impact of over-grazing, which is almost twice compared to Europe, while the percentage in North America was very low with only 1.5%.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 91
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 79
- The maps below shows the development of a particular area from 1965 to present day 73
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th America was very low with only 1.5%.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71014492754 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53283144762 2.65546596893 133% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.3550761118 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.857142857 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110451838507 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063275080647 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810864273844 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961462550734 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942152705898 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 61.2550243902 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.43 11.4140731707 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.