Before us there is a pie chart that illustrates the main causes of land degradation, around the world, and also a table that shows the percentage of destroyed land in three different areas, during 1990.
Overall, the main cause worldwide of land destruction is associated with cattle feeding. In addition, the continent most affected is Europe, but mainly associated with deforestation. In contrast, North America has the lowest damage in the land.
First of all, 35% worldwide is directly associated with over-grazing, while the second and third causes of land degradation are related to deforestation and excessive cultivation, representing 30% and 28%, respectively. Other causes affect only 7% of total land destruction.
Furthermore, Europe, with 23% of its land degraded, is the most affected, with 10% more as in Oceania, and 19% in USA. In, Europe, the destruction of forests represent the main reason, with 9.8%, but also over-cultivation and cattle have a significant impact (7.7% and 5.5%, respectively). In contrast, in North America, where deforestation almost do not occur (0.2%), but excessive cultivation is leading (3.3%), while less than half is associated with over-grazing. Finally, Oceania do not have any problem with cultivation, but cattle is causing the major impact on land with 11.3%, if compared with the minor impact of deforestation (1.7%)
- Some people think that teenagers who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adult criminals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 84
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
- There is growing evidence that man-made activities are making global temperatures higher.What might be the man-made causes of temperatures rising? How should we deal with this problem? 78
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes, and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is imp 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ed, is the most affected, with 10% more as in Oceania, and 19% in USA. In, Europe,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40654205607 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15837038993 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584112149533 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.410016841 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.7 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 5.23603664747 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185140991907 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875978918249 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837480908544 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148522530395 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998104507958 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.