The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart illustrates information about the principal causes of agricultural land degration in three different regions, while the table explains how these causes affected these regions in 1990.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the major factor that caused the worldwide land degradation was over-grazing and that Europe had the highest percentage of total land degraded compared to that of North America and Oceania.
As is observed from the first graph, the main reasons for soil degradation around the globe was due to over-grazing, which constituted 35% of the total. Other important reasons of land degradation were deforestation and over-cultivation, with 30% and 28% correspondingly. Other causes accounted for only 7%.
In regard to the second table, in Europe the total land degraded depicted 23% of the total. According to this, the soil was less productive due to deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing, with 9.8%, 7.7% and 5.5% respectively. Oceania, was the second on this list with 13% of land degraded, the main cause of this degration was over-grazing, which constitued 11.3% of that. North America had only 5% of land degraded, therefore it was the least region among these in terms of land degradation.
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers. 78
- The internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are. On the other hand, it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialise. 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced. 11
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... America and Oceania. As is observed from the first graph, the main reasons f...
^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were deforestation and over-cultivation, with 30% and 28% correspondingly. Other...
^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and over-cultivation, with 30% and 28% correspondingly. Other causes accounted ...
^^
Line 6, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Europe the total land degraded depicted 23% of the total. According to this, the...
^^
Line 6, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...3% of that. North America had only 5% of land degraded, therefore it was the leas...
^^
Line 6, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mong these in terms of land degradation.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, while, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41836734694 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25729246242 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576530612245 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3704751426 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202254797068 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883447104837 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936528302717 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146195753038 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115573590386 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.