The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information about several causes of degradation of agricultural land in terms of its productivity and the percentage of land degradation in three different regions affected by these factors in the period 1990s is illustrated by the figure.
The most significant facts to emerge from the graphs are that over-grazing shows its domination over other causes in making farmland becomes less productive. Moreover, the highest total area degraded was in europe.
There are four three main reasons for this problem, which are over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation. The former is the highest proportion of the cause of soil degradation which accounts for nearly slightly above a third. The two latter have lower portions of 30% and 28% each.
Decreasing soil productivity happened in North America, europe, and oceania which the biggest area degraded was in the second continent having almost slightly below a fourth of its total farmland. it consisted of nearly a tenth of deforestation, 7.7% of over-cultivation and 5.5% over-grazing. In contrast, the NA area had a low portion that was broken which accounted for 5% only with only 0.2% of the first problem and 3.3% and 1.5% of the remaining causes respectively. Meanwhile, oceania had 13% of their land degraded which dominated by over-grazing reason for 11.3% and the remaining caused by the first problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...y below a fourth of its total farmland. it consisted of nearly a tenth of deforest...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36405529954 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13999761801 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589861751152 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.236439442 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.4 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16642725456 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602399395515 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697037658005 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11656426888 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671230743595 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.