The pie chart informs the causes of agricultural land that becomes less productive. the other data is described in the table. it explains degraded land in three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The highest contribution o land degradation is due to over-grazing (35%). In number two, deforestation gives 30 percent of the land degradation. Another factor of land degradation is over-cultivation (28%). The rest causes is categorized b 'other' (7%).
In total, during the 1990s, Europe was the highest in land degradation with 23 percent. Followed by Oceania (13%) and North America (5%). specifically, land degraded by deforestation in Europe was the highest among other regions while North America was the lowest. In over-cultivation, Europe had 7.7 percent and North America 3.3 percent. In contrast, there was no land degradation by this activity in Oceania. However, Oceania became the highest in over-grazing by 11.3 percent, followed by Europe (5.5%) and North America (1.5 %).
- TOEFL T P O 46 Integrated Writing Task 86
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive.The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990's Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make 61
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 80
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 60
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ural land that becomes less productive. the other data is described in the table. i...
^^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...e other data is described in the table. it explains degraded land in three regions...
^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Specifically
...ed by Oceania 13% and North America 5%. specifically, land degraded by deforestation in Euro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31612903226 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16196578309 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 24.8322180494 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.3846153846 112.824112599 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.9230769231 22.9334400587 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.76923076923 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128368861168 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632364180601 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100772543624 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141702115194 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133374982749 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.