The pie charts illustrate data about of the proportion of people went to the US from different countries between 1988 and 1992.
Overall, the number of visitors from Canada and others increased year by year, while the number of Mexicans and Chinese decreased at the period of four years from 1988. Mexico had the highest figure of people, but the opposite was true for Chinese’s visitors.
From 1988 to 1990, the percentage of Canada reduced significantly to 20%; however, it went up again at 26% in 1992. At the same time, the number of others visitors, which had the lowest percentage in the beginning, grew substantially about 20% and was the second in the last year.
As can be seen from the graph, starting from the highest proportion, the number of Mexican went down considerably by 13% but it was still the highest figure in 1992. Followed by that, the China’s visitors went to US fell into 4%, which was the lowest number.
- The table The table shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that we do not need printed paper newspapers Do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows how one type of coal is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task All large companies should provide sports and community facilities to the local community To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exam 67
- Healthcare should not be provided for free regardless of a person s income The health of a person is in their own hands and they should therefore be held accountable for that Do you agree with this opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and Chinese decreased at the period of four years from 1988. Mexico had the hig...
^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l into 4%, which was the lowest number.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84049079755 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63783705907 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558282208589 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.191903226 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326655214448 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158196370688 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158872193665 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235143040684 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163663113226 0.0819641961636 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.