The pie charts compare the proportion of travelers visiting the US from different countries in three distinct years.
Overall the percentage of visitor from Canada and other countries decreased steadily during the period while the figure for Chinese people increased significally. It can be seen that the proportion of Canadians remained the highest over the period.
In 1998 more than half of visitors to US was from Canada whereas the percentage of Chinese tourists choosing US to visit only stood at around 10%. However the proportion of people from Canada decreased substantially from 53% to 40% of total people visiting the US in 4 years later. Meanwhile the figure for China rose dramatically to about 30% in 1990 and then grew to exactly 30% in 1992.
As for Mexico the percentage of Mexicans travelling to the US remained steady about 25% in the 4 years period, despite decreased to a fifth in 1990 before rose up to 26% in 1992. Lastly, other countries was only of a tiny fraction but also saw a decrease during the period.
- The pie chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 84
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from 4 different countries taking the IELTS Test in 2009 67
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 61
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...g US to visit only stood at around 10%. However the proportion of people from Canada de...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... decreased substantially from 53% to 40% of total people visiting the US in 4 yea...
^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...eople visiting the US in 4 years later. Meanwhile the figure for China rose dramatically ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, so, then, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8813559322 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66618783406 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553672316384 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8603203969 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303528970637 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128014218156 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993204560581 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196257922225 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101119500706 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.