The charts compare the proportion of tourists traveling to America, who are from Canada, Mexico, China, and others in 1988,1990 and 1992.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of visitors from Canada and other countries decreased, while that of China increased and Mexico showed some fluctuated over the surveyed period. Also, Canada was the highest figure among the four.
In 1988, the largest proportion of travelers was allocated to Canada (more than half of the total travelers). The figure for Mexico was approximately doubled that for China, at 25% and 10% respectively. The remaining 12% is accounted for a range of other countries. In 1990, the percentage of tourists from Canada dropped moderately but remained the highest figure in the chart, by a margin of 10%. The figure for Mexico suffered a noticeable fell off by 5%.
In 1992, the proportion of Chinese travelers grew continually to 30%. A sharp reverse trend could be seen in the figure for Mexico, stood at 26%. In contrast, that of Canada and others has an opposite trend, as the former contributed 40% and the latter was responsible for the lowest percentage with a very small number 4%
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 84
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries india and China. Write a report to university lecture and describe the data. 73
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organisation.What might be be the case?What could be disadvantages of being self-employed? 84
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 78
- The pie chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98974358974 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69186321117 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.16123548 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4545454545 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127515993275 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509955982852 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069429349366 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10167189703 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687920937384 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.