The pie chart show the electricity generated in germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant .

Essay topics:

The pie chart show the electricity generated in germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant .

The four pie chart compare the electricity generated between germany and france in the year of 2009 . In a germany conventional thermal was maximum 59.6%and in a france it was minimum 10.3% . In a germany and france nuclear and renewables were 23.0% , 17.4%, 76.0%, 13.7% respectively .

Afterthat , in a 2009 renewables sources were describe on different four categories . We can clearly see that the hydroelectric in germany . It was 17.7 per centum and in france it was maximum to other categories it was 80.5% .moreover, biomass in germany up to hydroelectric it was 39.3 per centum .it was lowest in france it was 8.1per centum. Wind and solar were highest percentage as compair of france .it were 36.9% and 6.1% respectivly.
In a france that were declined wind source was 10.5% and solar sources were lowest per centum . It was 0.9%.
Overall , germany generated 560 billion kwh electricity and france produced 510 billion kwh. Conventional thermal highly produced electricity and in a germany and nuclear sources were generated highest percentum in france .

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-25 wokoma elisha 67 view
2021-07-02 rahulchd 90 view
2021-04-18 dhillonsukh 73 view
2020-12-11 smyth 56 view
2020-09-25 Turonxoja 84 view
Essays by user Amanchahal :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n germany and france in the year of 2009 . In a germany conventional thermal was m...
^^
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...9.6%and in a france it was minimum 10.3% . In a germany and france nuclear and ren...
^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...france nuclear and renewables were 23.0% , 17.4%, 76.0%, 13.7% respectively . A...
^^
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...23.0% , 17.4%, 76.0%, 13.7% respectively . Afterthat , in a 2009 renewables sou...
^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...76.0%, 13.7% respectively . Afterthat , in a 2009 renewables sources were descr...
^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'described'.
Suggestion: described
...hat , in a 2009 renewables sources were describe on different four categories . We can c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...re describe on different four categories . We can clearly see that the hydroelectr...
^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ly see that the hydroelectric in germany . It was 17.7 per centum and in france it...
^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...maximum to other categories it was 80.5% .moreover, biomass in germany up to hydro...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... to hydroelectric it was 39.3 per centum .it was lowest in france it was 8.1per c...
^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r centum .it was lowest in france it was 8.1per centum. Wind and solar were highe...
^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the highest'.
Suggestion: were the highest
...e it was 8.1per centum. Wind and solar were highest percentage as compair of france .it wer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... highest percentage as compair of france .it were 36.9% and 6.1% respectivly. In ...
^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the lowest'.
Suggestion: were the lowest
...wind source was 10.5% and solar sources were lowest per centum . It was 0.9%. Overall , ge...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...and solar sources were lowest per centum . It was 0.9%. Overall , germany generat...
^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...owest per centum . It was 0.9%. Overall , germany generated 560 billion kwh elect...
^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sources were generated highest percentum in france .
^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e generated highest percentum in france .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16860465116 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87885348142 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476744186047 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8650870172 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8181818182 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6363636364 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.45454545455 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 1.69756097561 1060% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206431549792 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103363541649 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909666375628 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153610480129 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772193030179 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.