The pie chart show the reasons people in Great Britain had for visiting art museums in the years 1990 and 2000.
The pie chart compared the amount of visitors go to museums for some reasons that had changed from 1990 and 2000.
As an overview, most people spend time at museums to learn and gain knowledge, it is the most reason during 10 years. There was a slight shift in almost the categories from 1990 to 2000, especially the reason that people visit for filling in the travel schedules.
According to the pie chart, we can see clearly that nearly a half people visit museums for approaching and researching about the knowledge in 1990, and it still hold their place and accounted for 45% in the year 2000, be the most purpose over the ten-years period. Followed by being a part of travel, it stood at over one to forth in 1990, but it decreased significantly over a half of the 1990 rate, and was at 12% at the end of this period. While both family or friend time and attending a special exhibition was little low in 1990, just at 12%, there was upward trend through 10 years, Time for family and friend was at 17% and special exhibitions was be the second purpose with 18% in the end of this report. Buying art and others are not the main reasons for people with buying art and others just 1% and 4%, these rates had a bit change to 5% and 3% in 2000.
- Although more and more people read the news on the internet, newspaper, will remain the main source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree with the statement 56
- The tale below gives information about management positions help by women in European country in 2006 75
- the graph below shows the employment rate of each gender in four countries in 2002 71
- critically evaluate whether the cause of delinquent behavior in teenagers is mainly genetic or environmental Analyze the effects this behavior has on society 78
- the government should impose a fee on drivers who use their vehicles during the rush hour to help cut down on air pollution from exhausting fumes 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'holds'?
Suggestion: holds
...out the knowledge in 1990, and it still hold their place and accounted for 45% in th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 656, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... was at 17% and special exhibitions was be the second purpose with 18% in the end ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.35042735043 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24962152156 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542735042735 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.270478779 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.428571429 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4285714286 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364414568386 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190502821672 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120850524713 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288136019271 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560581815549 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.82 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.4 10.3012195122 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.