The pie chart shows the percentage of persons arrested in the five years and the bar chart shows the most recent reasons for arrest in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts provide data on the number of arrested people in a five-year period and the bar chart illustrates the reasons for recent arrest cases in 2008.
Overall, the data of female prisoners was the highest, compared to that of males. Moreover, the most popular explanation for recent arrest cases for both genders in 2008 was due to public drinking.
As regards males, nearly three quarters of them were arrested, but the data was approximately 20% less than that of females. Moreover, the number of not arrested females accounted for 9%, four times less than that of males.
In 2008, the most common reason for recent arrest was public drinking, ranging from 30% to nearly 37% for both genders, respectively. However, there were the least cases of recent arrest without any reason, less than 6% for females and males. Considering drink-driving, the percentage of males was about 20% higher than of females. The same pattern also repeated with breach of order. Assault, theft and other reasons saw small differences between the number of females and males under arrest.
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 78
- The table shows data about underground railway systems in six major cities with date opened kilometres of route and passenger numbers per year in millions Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where rele 73
- Some people say that drug companies have a responsibility to spend money on researching medicines that will help people in poorer countries Others say the main responsibility of drug companies is to make money Discuss both these views and give your own op 89
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- With the pressures on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school eg physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie charts provide data on the numbe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asons for recent arrest cases in 2008. Overall, the data of female prisoners wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in 2008 was due to public drinking. As regards males, nearly three quarters ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., four times less than that of males. In 2008, the most common reason for rece...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04469273743 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49020427243 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.695486997 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267838651745 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110558258837 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122047234802 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196703322125 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135867450803 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie charts provide data on the numbe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asons for recent arrest cases in 2008. Overall, the data of female prisoners wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in 2008 was due to public drinking. As regards males, nearly three quarters ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., four times less than that of males. In 2008, the most common reason for rece...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04469273743 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49020427243 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.695486997 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267838651745 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110558258837 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122047234802 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196703322125 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135867450803 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.