The pie charts above demonstrate the responses to a questionnaire asking 100 Customers to the Parkway hotel on how they favored its service.
It is clear that within only 5 years from 2005 the hotel had showed shown greater results with more and more Visitors voted positively.
In 2005, there were 15% of the stayers in the Parkway Hotel rated the service as terribly poor, with 21% more felt that it was poor. Contemporarily, the percentage of people voted satisfactory was 46%. Those who thought it was good was 14%, but only 5% of the customers viewed the service as excellent.
In 2010, the people ticking Parkway Hotel service poor and very poor, both dropped by 9%. On the other hand, the proportion of the guests rating it almost tripled at 39% within 55 years. Visitors who felt satisfied enough with the service accounted for just 17% in 2010, but those rating it excellent rose significantly up to 28%.
The pie charts above demonstrate the responses to a questionnaire asking 100 Customers to the Parkway hotel on how they favored its service.
It is clear that within only 5 years from 2005 the hotel had showed shown greater results with more and more Visitors voted positively.
In 2005, there were 15% of the stayers in the Parkway Hotel rated the service as terribly poor, with 21% more felt that it was poor. Contemporarily, the percentage of people voted satisfactory was 46%. Those who thought it was good was 14%, but only 5% of the customers viewed the service as excellent.
In 2010, the people ticking Parkway Hotel service poor and very poor, both dropped by 9%. On the other hand, the proportion of the guests rating it almost tripled at 39% within 55 years. Visitors who felt satisfied enough with the service accounted for just 17% in 2010, but those rating it excellent rose significantly up to 28%.
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The line graph above demonstrates the quantity of waste released by three businesses A, B and C over fifteen years from 2000 to 2015.It’s easy to see that the three above bear little to no resemblance in the fluctuation of waste produced in tonnes.In th 84
- The line graph compares the average price of a barrel of oil with the food price index over a period of 11 years.It is clear that average global prices of both oil and food rose considerably between 2000 and 2011. Furthermore, the trends for both commodit 67
- The pie charts above compare figures of the population age of Yemen and Italy in the year 2000 and estimations on those statistics in 2050.It is clear from the graphs that the people of the between 15 and 59 in the two countries account for a large propor 73
- The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84905660377 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57390273279 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635220125786 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2984671607 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.375 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437376584976 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17693348142 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.221329138945 0.0843802449381 262% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31906490622 0.15604864568 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.234482446468 0.0819641961636 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.