The table and charts provide information about the total expenditure and source of imported fish to the US from 1988 to 2000.
Overall, the total value of fish imported to the US increased significantly throughout the period, in which Canada became the biggest exporter in the beginning of the period, while countries other than Canada and China exported more fish in the rest of the years.
Looking into details, in 1988, the US spent 6.57 billion dollars to import fish, in which six-tenths of the total came from Canada, just above one-tenths was from China, and more than a quarter was from other countries.
Furthermore, the expenditure in fish importing went up significantly by around 2 billion dollars in 1992, of which almost half of them were purchased from countries other than Canada and China. In contrast, Canada and China sold fish to the US at only one-third and one-fifth of the total.
In addition, spending more than 10 billion dollars in 2000, the US reached a peak in terms of imported fish consumption. In this year, the proportion of fish bought from Canada fell by 6%, while that from China rose considerably by 10%, and four-tenths of the fish was imported from other countries, making them the biggest exporter.
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- City transport mode shares in Asia in 2012 45
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- City transport mode shares in Asia in 2012 61
- City transport mode shares in Asia in 2012 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 122, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... in terms of imported fish consumption. In this year, the proportion of fish bough...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64465404379 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495238095238 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.6905891947 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.571428571 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209666719778 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13726409195 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134745790826 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169762898061 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147367883567 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.