The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world.
The pie charts illustrate the water usage for residential, industry, and agriculture in San Diego, California, and worldwide.
Residential takes more than a half of the whole water usage in San Diego. However, California only spend about a third of the water usage for it even though such dominates upon industry and agriculture in both places. Surprisingly, only less than 10% of the global water usage contributes for residential usage.
Agriculture becomes the major purpose of the water usage globally with almost three quarter of the whole portion. However, only just below 30% of it spent for agriculture in California. Even less, San Diego takes less than a fifth of the whole water usage for agriculture.
Interestingly, industry is always in the middle proportion rank compared to the two others. Industry spends almost a quarter of the whole water usage in San Diego and worldwide, however, California spends 10% more than those two groups.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-31 | dangtrinhlt | 73 | view |
| 2016-11-23 | math | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-20 | thuphuong2302 | 67 | view |
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 61
- The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants.Write a report for a university lecturer descr 56
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23376623377 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83331266383 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506493506494 0.547539520022 93% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4701089281 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5555555556 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362359077476 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16890267923 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104263138728 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263568717916 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089787874472 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.