The pie chart compares two cities namely San Diego and California with rest of the world in terms of water usage for three different purposes.
Overall, it can be seen that,a major proportion of both cities total water goes for residential purposes while, rest of the world uses a loin share of its total water for agriculture.
water for residential purposes in San Diego and California accounts for 60% and 39% respectively. Whereas, only 7% of total water uses for domestic purposes world widely. On the contrary, in terms agriculture the trend is almost opposite to this, in this area San Diego and California figures are 17% and 28% respectively. However the figure for agriculture purpose of water usage surprisingly high for rest of the world, 69%.
In the case of industrial water usage there is a similar figure for San Diego and rest of the world, 23%. But for California it is 10% higher than the other two.
- Some people believe that the government spends too much money on developing space exploration technology There are many others financial needs that the government should address instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- Favourite school subject for boys in school 61
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 73
- The chart below shows information about the challenges people face when they go to live in other countries. 93
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er usage for three different purposes. Overall, it can be seen that,a major pro...
^^
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
...urposes. Overall, it can be seen that,a major proportion of both cities total w...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re of its total water for agriculture. water for residential purposes in San Di...
^^
Line 3, column 3, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Water
... of its total water for agriculture. water for residential purposes in San Diego a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and California accounts for 60% and 39% respectively. Whereas, only 7% of total ...
^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...site to this, in this area San Diego and California figures are 17% and 28% respe...
^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...a figures are 17% and 28% respectively. However the figure for agriculture purpose of w...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...purpose of water usage surprisingly high for rest of the world, 69%. In the c...
^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... case of industrial water usage there is a similar figure for San Diego and rest ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81132075472 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63374119801 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534591194969 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7712207507 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412688240434 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212070261974 0.103423049105 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152119380205 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309251140667 0.15604864568 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15395862154 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.