The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Presented is the graph illustrating how the different in using water purpose happens in the two big cities and the worldwide. All in all, it is clear that water is usually used for residential aims higher than industry and agriculture in san Diego and California while the world spent water for agriculture more tan other sections. looking at the pie charts more closely, one can see that the percentage of using water in sections of the two cities is the dominant residential purpose; however, using water of residential section in San Diego is nearly twice as much as in California after that the lower fields are industry(23% and 33%) and agriculture(17% and 28%) in both two capitals( san Diego and California), respectively . in contrast, the gap of agriculture has widen more other sections than combined accounted for 69% with agriculture and industry(23%), residential (8%), respectively. When comparing between the two cities and the world is completely contrasted together, everything is exchanged ordinarily from the lowest field into the highest section and vice versa.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-09 | phạm khánh linh | view |
- While people in developing countries are happier than in the past people in developed countries are less happy Why What can be learnt from this 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should wr 78
- he maps below give information about a school in 2004 and the change of the same school in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- The pie charts below present information about what the UK graduates did after leaving university in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Looking
...or agriculture more tan other sections. looking at the pie charts more closely, one can...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 723, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s san Diego and California, respectively . in contrast, the gap of agriculture has...
^^
Line 1, column 726, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...an Diego and California, respectively . in contrast, the gap of agriculture has wi...
^^
Line 1, column 766, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'widened'.
Suggestion: widened
...in contrast, the gap of agriculture has widen more other sections than combined accou...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 844, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d accounted for 69% with agriculture and industry23%, residential 8%, respectivel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19075144509 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98222150946 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578034682081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.0475147438 43.030603864 216% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.6 112.824112599 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157097937982 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761238546231 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062674640642 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157097937982 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 61.2550243902 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.