The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown.
The pie charts compare Japan and Malaysia in terms of average domestic spendings on five different categories, namely housing, transport, food, healthcare and other goods and services.
Overall, spending on other goods and services accounted for the largest proportion of expenses in Japan, while the figure for Malaysia is on housing. In addition, people in both countries spent the smallest percentages of expenses on healthcare.
21% of expenditure in Japan was for housing, while the proportion of expense for this field was significantly higher, at 34%, which accounted for the largest part. In terms of food, Japanese spent 24% of their income on it, which was 3% lower than the figure for Malaysian. The percentages of spending on other goods and services in Japan and Malaysia were 29% and 26% respectively.
People in Malaysia spent 10% of their total income on transport. Japanese’s expenditure on this category was doubled that of Malaysian, which took up 20% out of 100%. The proportion of Malaysian’s spending on healthcare was 3%, while 6% was how much people in Japan spent on this field.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-06-12 | thupham1909 | 67 | view |
2017-06-12 | thupham1909 | 73 | view |
2017-06-12 | thupham1909 | 56 | view |
2017-06-12 | thupham1909 | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views 67
- Nowadays, more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- the graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features anf make comparision where relevant 61
- The line graph below shows the percantage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selactig and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... on healthcare was 3%, while 6% was how much people in Japan spent on this field. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23333333333 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97924404199 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9129428758 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145930062572 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656909522192 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044254541056 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101359344018 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280887717002 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.