The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students, PhD students, and junior lecturers at an Australian university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented pie charts reveal how many journal articles are read weekly by Ph.D. students and junior lecturers compared to other students at an Australian university.
Overall, the majority of students at this university tend to read 1-5 journal articles, while most junior lecturers read 6-11 articles weekly. As for Ph.D. students, the figure for at least 12 articles read per week is the highest.
Regarding how many journal articles are read by all students, 67% of students prefer reading 1-5 articles per week as opposed to the percentage of students reading at least 12 journal articles, which accounts for only 12%. The opposite is true with Ph.D. students. While 80% of them read at least 12 articles from academic journals weekly, there is only 5% reading from 1-5 journal articles per week. The proportion of students reading 6-11 journal articles weekly in these two pie charts is not significantly different, with 21% and 15% for all students and Ph.D. students respectively.
At a staggering 75%, the majority of junior lecturers read from 6-11 articles from academic journals per week, followed by the figure for at least 12 articles read weekly by them with 24%. Only 1% of junior lecturers read 1-5 journal articles per week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-11 | nahid_tavasspli | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | YESWANTH KALUVA | 42 | view |
| 2021-08-04 | shinelks02@gmail.com | view | |
| 2021-07-04 | baljit12 | view | |
| 2021-07-04 | baljit12 | view |
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home housework and gardening 61
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of businesses that have social media presence 88
- The chart below gives information about Someland s main exports in 2005 2015 and future projections for 2025 92
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, as for, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08737864078 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57303534507 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427184466019 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0325579117 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39871741497 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227771554072 0.103423049105 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105768973429 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315366407544 0.15604864568 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464948833533 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.