The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The pie charts The two pie charts compare the proportion of six standard household expenditures in a country in the year of 1950 and 2010.
As can be seen from the charts in 1950 housing took the two-third part in household expenses while in 2010 food came in the priority. The amount of outlay from Food, Healthcare and transportation in 2010 is comparatively high in comparison with the rate of household expenses in 1950. Meanwhile Education expenses in 2010 showed decline in proportion.
Now turning to the details, the bulk of the expenses in 1950 was made for the housing and food which accounted for a massive 72.1% and 11.2% of the total expenditures. In opposite, it can be observed that people prioritized buying food (34%) more than housing (22%) six decades later. Health care had the lowest amount of money spent on in both years.
In addition, transportation expenses had remarkably increased by roughly three times from only 3.3% in 1950 to 14% in 2010. Aside from that, spending on other items also rose to 19.3% from 4.4% in 1950. Education expense ratio, however, had slightly decreased where people insignificantly spent 0.3% more in 1960 than in 2010.
To summarize, basic necessities such as food and housing are the two main categories people spent most percentages of money on, however, health care aspect was the least prioritized
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-21 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | Mostakima Tawrin | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-05 | quytnee | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...a country in the year of 1950 and 2010. As can be seen from the charts in 1950 hou...
^^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...the rate of household expenses in 1950. Meanwhile Education expenses in 2010 showed decli...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...re in 1960 than in 2010. To summarize, basic necessities such as food and housing are the two ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, third, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95614035088 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78328785605 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55701754386 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8963256026 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.727272727 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262542414387 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107188270831 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13839034548 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170835979725 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184561555671 0.0819641961636 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.