The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia is the year 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts show the proportion of money spent on households in Malaysia and Japan in 2010 for five household categories namely- housing, health-care, Food, Transport and Other goods and services.
As illustrate, we can see that in Malaysia the greatest proportion of expenditure was on Housing at 34%, while In Japan housing accounted for just 215 of the whole household expenditures. In contrast, in Japan the biggest single portion of expense was on other goods and services at 29%, compared with 26% in Malaysia. Food came in second place for both countries, in Japan at 24%, while in Malaysia the portion was slightly higher (27%). In Japan transportation was another main expense, but this was much lower in Malaysia at 10%. AT last, in both countries Health-care toke the smallest percentage of total expenditure, where In Japan it was 6% and in Malaysia spent only 3%.
In summary, the data indicates that the main expenses for both countries were on goods and services food and housing, while transportation and health-care were given less prioritized.
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 72
- Average number of hours per week spent doing activities around the home 56
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 92
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 84
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.Discuss this view and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ealth-care were given less prioritized.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, while, in contrast, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10857142857 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90448773101 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548571428571 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0708092434 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.714285714 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174853267078 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905845315521 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566573563705 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12401909068 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787444545883 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.