The supplied pie chat illustrate the comparison of households investment in two different countries Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
As is presented in pie chart , Japan covered the 29% of other goods and services. In the mean time 21% of expenditure are involved in housing and 20% of them are included in transport. Approximately , 24% are invested of food and healthcare by 6%.
In Malaysia housing is accounted by 34% and it has covered about 35% of the pie chart . The food expended by 27% and transport by 10%. Health care and other goods and services have 3% and 26% respectively.
Overall, the transport of Japan was the most contributed to the expenditure where as housing was the most contributed part to the investment in Malaysia. In contrast, both Japan and Malaysia had similar least contribution which is health care.
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 11
- The table below gives the information about rail transport in four countries in 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 67
- IELTS Task 1 - Tables give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- The graph below shows Long-Term International Migration in UK, 1999-2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ar 2010. As is presented in pie chart , Japan covered the 29% of other goods an...
^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...are included in transport. Approximately , 24% are invested of food and healthca...
^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cluded in transport. Approximately , 24% are invested of food and healthcare by ...
^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ximately , 24% are invested of food and healthcare by 6%. In Malaysia housing...
^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t has covered about 35% of the pie chart . The food expended by 27% and transport...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...services have 3% and 26% respectively. Overall, the transport of Japan was the ...
^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...the most contributed to the expenditure where as housing was the most contributed part ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uted to the expenditure where as housing was the most contributed part to the inv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 702.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94366197183 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92262485251 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3503200892 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296115661691 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104970567529 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102466196135 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178094712932 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844073495691 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.