The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
The charts illustrate about the average of household expenditures between Japan and Malaysia in 2010. There are five different of categories specifically housing, transport, food, health care, and other goods and services. Overall, the largest household expenditures in Japan was other goods and services whilst the highest spending in Malaysia was housing category. Whereas, two of country had similar lowest segment was health care.
Other goods and services happened be the biggest proportion on the household expenditures especially for Japan in standing at 29% which different from Malaysia only at 26%. The second part was 6% held by Japan health care which dissimilar from Malaysia simply 3%. Then it followed by transport which was 20% in Japan which preponderated from Malaysia just at 10%.
In other denomination, food expenditures of Japan got 24% which was lesser than Malaysia food expenditures was 27%. Otherwise, housing services made up 21% in Japan and 34% in Malaysia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | huongab123 | view | |
| 2023-06-19 | mykhanh | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | saminhsn | view | |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | view |
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 68
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 11
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diets. 56
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh than disadvantages. 67
- many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nding in Malaysia was housing category. Whereas, two of country had similar lowest segm...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44805194805 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84768949672 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.916944685 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2222222222 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272310386441 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139873228234 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140956637619 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199168631853 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447946795077 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.