The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years.
The given chart provides information about producing energy by five different types in France between 1995 and 2005.
Overall, it is clear that while the percentage of Coal, Gas, Nuclear, and other energy increased gradually, the opposite was true for Petrol energy. Also, Coal energy was the largest number and other energy was the lowest during the period.
In 1995, the percentage of Coal energy was the highest at 29,80%, compared to 29,63% of Gas energy which the second largest energy of production. Petrol energy accounted for 29,27% as opposed to 6,40% and 4,90% of Nuclear and Other energy respectively.
In the following 10 years, in 2005, the rate of Coal energy rose slightly to 30,93%, Gas energy increased steadily 30,31%. While the figure for Other and Nuclear energy increased by approximately 5% at around 9,10% and 10,10% respectively compared to in 1995. However, Petrol energy decreased rapidly around 10% during the period.
- In today's competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents' absence 73
- The table below shows the percentage of students giving good rating for different aspects of a university in China in 2000, 2005, 2010. 73
- Older people often say that their life was better in the past than it is now Do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- All the mothers and fathers should be required to take childcare training courses What is your opinion 63
- The chart below shows International migration in UK. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2091503268 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50520411823 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3414186659 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.625 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159467406388 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834389515073 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045695331486 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113828111964 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043162043465 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.