The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The pie charts compare the changes in energy production from 5 different sources in France in two separate years, 1995 and 2005.
Overall, the amount of energy generated from all sources increased slightly in 2005 except for petrol, which decreased significantly. It is also noticeable that coal and gas were the main sources of energy production whereas other sources produced the least percentage of energy in both years.
The proportion of energy produced from coal in 1995 was 29.80% and this, then, rose slightly to 30.93% in 2005. Similarly, energy production from gas in 1995 was 29.63% which climbed a mere 1% to 30.31% in 2005.
With regard to energy production from other sources and nuclear power, both figures grew by almost 5% in 2005 to 9.10% and 10.10% respectively. By contrast, a dramatic drop of around a fifth to 19.55% in 2005 could be seen on the amount of energy produced from petrol.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Zulph_ | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jesslynindah | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jesslynindah | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Zulph_ | 56 | view |
- The charts below give information about the amount and types of water in the world and also tell the use of water in three countries 77
- Some people say that television is useful for education while others say it is useful only for entertainment. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 67
- The bar graph below show the numbers of university students who chose Italian as their primary subject from 1960 to 2000. 61
- The pie charts below show the percentages of each material thrown out by the average household in California in 1985 and 2002. 78
- The charts below show the primary purposes for British people leaving their country in 1999 and the amount of those people who left the country for less than a week. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch climbed a mere 1% to 30.31% in 2005. With regard to energy production from ot...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, then, whereas, except for, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98701298701 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56272303103 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.3492200802 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210224643941 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118759458921 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131552077174 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172870926039 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149671802898 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.