The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.

The data explains the percentages of variety of source production of France in one decades. The petro had significant dropped and the others component had a fluctuation.

Regarding the charts it seems that from 1995 to 2005 did not have significant changes of the energies but since 2005 nuclear had improving 3,7%. Others energy had slowly increased to 9,10%. During 10 years, the productivity only have a small rise between 1% until 4%.

Following the pie charts, the graph show that petro was plunged from 29.27% to 19.55%. The France government support to aware of global warming used to proper way decrease petroleum impact. Cite sources from BBC news while oil rate become high but the government increasing the range tax of petroleum that affected the petroleum producing. Furthermore, in one decades France had dramatic fall of petro because of the changes policy.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-04 Humayan Kabir 56 view
2019-12-12 Zulph_ 73 view
2019-12-12 Jesslynindah 56 view
2019-12-12 Jesslynindah 56 view
2019-12-12 Zulph_ 56 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one decade', 'a decade', or simply 'decades'?
Suggestion: one decade; a decade; decades
...riety of source production of France in one decades. The petro had significant dropped and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hers component had a fluctuation. Regarding the charts it seems that from ...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a small rise between 1% until 4%. Following the pie charts, the graph show...
^^
Line 9, column 420, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'changes'' or 'change's'?
Suggestion: changes'; change's
...d dramatic fall of petro because of the changes policy.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 740.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17482517483 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62827309336 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.664335664336 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.119046607 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2222222222 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150319217735 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583400403318 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374708088434 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926927504806 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256095619581 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.