The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years

The given two pie charts illustrates the juxtaposition of different types of energies being produced in France in the years 1995 and 2005.

Overall, Coal made up the highest part of the energy production at the beginning while Nuclear energy contributed the least to the France economy. In comparison, at the end of the period, Gas and Petrol along with Coal become the largest segment and the lowest energy produced was Nuclear and other forms of energies.

It is lucid from the pie chart that Nuclear production accounted for 6.40% in 1995 and experienced a more than threefold upsurge to one- tenth in 2005. Other forms of energies were 4,90% in 1995 and had a slight growth of 5% in 2005. At the beginning of the period, Coal and Gas made up 29.80% and 29.63% in France respectively and these figures rose to 30.93%, and 30,31% in 2005.

Marching ahead, Petrol, which comprised almost a one-third production in France in 1995, fell to 19.55% in 2005. In contrast, energy production from other forms have seen an enormous growth in the both years.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... period, Coal and Gas made up 29.80% and 29.63% in France respectively and these ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, third, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82417582418 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52173261273 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7986002264 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265147752839 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118251983883 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971998671567 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182560776556 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101590907809 0.0819641961636 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.