The pie charts below show the data regarding the time people spend on smartphones and tablets, divided by category.
The change in the amount of time allocated on smartphones and tablets in six different extents is displayed in the pie charts, shown in percentage.
Overall, the most favorite function of these two devices is to play games. Furthermore, the utilities use rate of those technologies can be seen by far different each other.
As per data, the vast majority of smartphone and tablet users are likely to access games at more than a third and over a half, running. Turning to networking usage rate, surfing in social media by using cellphones only accounts for nearly three in ten, being higher than it by functioning tablets with a gap of 5%.
Markedly contrast, the rate of smartphones utilities is sixfold bigger than that of the counterpart ones. Moreover, utilizing smartphones and tabs for other aims are under a tenth. When it comes to remaining entertainments, either reading news or enjoying music and videos are also below one in ten on both gadgets.
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 78
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 56
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the top priorities by business companies in the USA in 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- Information technology is changing many aspect of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93209876543 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79855739396 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.716049382716 0.547539520022 131% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3272395482 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145626020936 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565243906621 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560271245823 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085665494509 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626957500685 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.