The pie charts below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts depict the share of Oscar winners by the 7 different given film genres for 2003 and 2008.
Overall, it can be seen that while 'Thriller' and 'Horror' in 2008 became less popular than 2003, 'Action', 'Science Fiction', 'Romance' and 'Documentary' were more popular than before (2003).
In detail, there was a considerable dip regarding the 'Thriller' from around half (46%) to about a quarter (25%) in the final year. Despite dropping in the proportion, it was still the number one genre in 2008. On the other hand, 'Action' witnessed a substantial swell roughly from 15% to 24% in 2008, which was a bit lower than 'Thriller'. There was only a marginal decrement with respect to 'Horror' from approximately 14% to 12% over a five year period.
In contrast, 'Science Fiction', 'Romance' and 'Documentary' exhibited almost similar increasing trends, which meant that they all experienced a rise by around 1-2% from 2003 to 2008. Surprisingly, the percent in terms of 'Comedy' in 2008 was as similar as 2003 (somewhere 4%), the least favourite category in both years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-12-15 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 85 | view |
- Humans tend to copy one another especially in fashion choice of clothes and consumer goods Do you agree or disagree Provide your view and examples from your own experience 70
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxi 90
- Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 90
- More and more are moving away from an agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work?What will be consequences of this? What solutions can you offer? 87
- Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 82
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 179 200
No. of Characters: 832 1000
No. of Different Words: 114 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.658 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.648 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.547 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 57 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 40 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.299 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.425 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.706 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.061 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, still, well, while, in contrast, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87709497207 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58005012666 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659217877095 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8982758155 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156191808866 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824930676802 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121951740989 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140284741193 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149321241487 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.